|
GLOVE Method for Evaluators |
|
|
|
|
Written by JD Austin
|
|
Speech Evaluations are the cornerstone of Toastmasters.
It is through these evaluations that speakers learn
areas in their speaking styles that need attention. Other club members also learn from the observations of
evaluators. A top evaluator will give his opinion of the speaker in such a manner that the speaker is left feeling
good about him, or her, self. Speech evaluations are the personal opinion of the evaluator. For every person in
the room observing a speech, there will be a different observation, and a different opinion of how the speech
went and how it can be improved. A good evaluator will show compassion to a speaker without sugar-coating
the presentation of the work. A favourable evaluation of a shoddy speech will not help the speaker improve. If
there are problems, they need to be pointed out...GENTLY. Praise goes a long way. Gentle direction given to
the speaker goes even further. The method I prefer to use is the ‘GLOVE’ method. The Sandwich technique,
which begins with a positive observation, offers suggestions, then closes on a positive note is most often used
by evaluators. The evaluator looks at the speech as a whole and generally chooses several things to praise and
several areas he, or she, feels needs some work. With this method there are often several areas that do not
get mentioned. With the ‘GLOVE’ method, the whole presentation is dealt with. Using the anachronism
‘GLOVE’, all areas are dealt with. Each letter helps to kick-start the evaluators thought process regarding
different parts of the evaluation. They stand for:
G - Gestures: Did the speaker use his hands, facial expression and body language to put his
topic across? If so, explain how?
L - Language: Was the language appropriate to the audience? At times a speaker will use lan-
guage that is difficult for the audience to understand. The use of acronyms that
are not explained, or professional terms that may be unfamiliar to the audience
will bewilder the audience. Is it off color? A slightly ‘blue’ speech may be fine in
some areas, but in general it is not.
O - Organization: Was the speech well organized? Did it have an opening, body and conclu-
sion?
V - Vocal Variety: Did the speech display the vocal range of the speaker?
E - Eye Contact: Did the speaker hold the audience’s attention through his, or her, eyes? Mak-
ing contact with the audience through the eyes will force the audience to
listen, even if the speech is a tad on the dull side. Looking at a particular
person almost long enough to almost make them uncomfortable, then focus-
ing on another person in the audience will rivet the attention to the speaker.
It is almost as if they don’t dare look away for fear of getting caught. Hope-
fully the speech will be interesting enough that this is not the case. Was the
speech exciting to watch? Good use of the final letter is
E - Enthusiasm: Enthusiasm captivates an audience.
|
|
Last Updated ( Thursday, 13 April 2006 )
|